Book cover changes can sometimes be a good thing. As a graphic designer, I can appreciate that fact. They can introduce a new generation to an old classic that might not otherwise be glanced at.
Sometimes, however...
This happens...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85671/85671ffacc8be4c5cb4210a18634198c64b8c3d8" alt="" |
BSC Book Cover: circa 2010 |
I guess it's better than this previous remake (which thankfully I've never noticed before):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68409/68409d5ff5b88d5fa7ca3b3eec3f4749ebb48a26" alt="" |
BSC Book Cover: circa 1990 |
But sometimes I just have to ask... why mess with the original? It was great and it makes me nostalgic just to look it! I admit the girls look a little outdated, but then again... this series
is set in the 80's. How else should they look?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1462/a146213bb23c2f95198b6a27bdec8836cff4d41f" alt="" |
BSC Book Cover: circa 1986 |
Of all the remakes I found of this cover, I think the 1995 version was the best (though I still prefer the original). It updates the cover image to appeal to a new generation, but it still maintains the spirit of the original. I wish the current book cover design had been as thoughtful.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6edb/e6edb71e6fa5cbc8ba3000f2ea7bab8aaf41755e" alt="" |
BSC Book Cover: circa 1995 |
I loved the Babysitters CLub so much! I had almost every single book, back in the 80's. I like the idea of kids reading them now... with the OLD cover!
ReplyDelete