Skip to main content

Book Review: The Archived

Alright I gotta be honest. The first 7-8 chapters deserve about 2 out of 5 stars, at most. The rest of the book, especially the last half, deserve about 7 out of 5 stars. Super good. I'll balance it out by giving this book a 5-star rating, but don't think that's because it's perfect, because it's not. Just wanted to clarify that.

Once I got past the beginning, this book was fabulously entertaining. We enter a realm where things aren't always what they appear to be, and mysteries are a way of life for the main chracter, Mackenzie Bishop. Mackenzie is a Keeper, someone who can see escaped Histories (the dead who have woken up) and whose job it is to return them to the Archives (where the Histories are cataloged... sort of a library that files away all the dead people who've died in that part of the city).

** Spoiler Alert -- the following paragraphs contain minor book spoilers, just to warn you ** 

There were two main issues I had with the beginning of this book, so bad that I nearly gave up reading several times:

----> First off, it literally took me 2-3 chapters before I could definitely decide who Da was, or rather, who he wasn't. The way it's written, I assumed Da was just a mis-print and the author had meant to write Dad. Da seemed to be dead and Dad didn't, but the entire premise of the book is that she deals with dead people, so it seemed very fathomable that these two characters could be actually the same character, just with a few typos in there. It's extremely careless writing to name two characters nearly the same name, especially without clarifying who they are. It wasn't until about the 9th chapter that it's even stated that Da is, indeed, her grandfather, not her father, but in the beginning chapters especially, it's not even clear if Da is a separate person as Dad, or the same person. Very very poorly written and explained.

----> Second thing... LIke I said it took me about 8 chapters to even get into this book. That's because the first chapters are mainly just explanation... often-contradicting-each-other explanations. At least it seems that way until you understand the explanations better. Basically I felt like just as soon as I understood one part, another explanation was given that either explained things further or differently. It made it so extremely confusing that I very nearly stopped reading after every chapter. Only the great reviews made me push through, and I'm glad I did, but dang... NOT a great way to begin a book. Seriously. The premise should've been summed up in a few paragraphs... one chapter at most. Having it take 7 chapters to explain was entirely too long and tedious. Don't get me wrong - her writing is incredible, but taking that long to set up the story was ridiculous.

I give this book 5 out of 5 stars.


Popular posts from this blog


I have come to the realization that I may have been mis-typed. I have often taken personality tests and generally come up with the result that I am INFP. I recently took a test that said I was INFJ actually, and the more I have been researching, the more that actually sounds like me.

What it really comes down to is the external/internal focus of the different functions (a topic that I'm still trying to wrap my head around, so I apologize if I don't explain it right). The I--J tends to actually function more as a "Perceiver" than a "Judger", contrary to what you might think (and vice versa for the I--P), which is a common reason these two types are mistaken for each other. How it actually plays out though is quite distinctive, which is why once I started reading more about INFJ's, I realized how much more like me it sounded. Basically, there are...
"...two broad and fundamental options for approaching life and information: Judging and Perceiving. Pe…

Vintage Travel Poster

One of our projects this coming term is to do a computer illustration of a painted vintage travel poster. I've been Googling some options and here are some that I like. Which would you pick?

80's Cartoons: Then and Now

I was browsing tv this morning while eating breakfast (tsk, tsk, I know...) and ran across a shocking sight. They've remade a BUNCH of the 80's cartoons, and not very flatteringly at that. I knew about Strawberry Shortcake and Care Bears, but check out some of these other ones, too! As an 80's child myself, I've often wished over the years that those old cartoons would make a comeback, this wasn't exactly what I meant!

Strawberry Shortcake: Then and Now
The 80's Strawberry people were reminiscent of the sugary treats that gave them their names. Now the characters look more like shrunken Barbie dolls.

Care Bears: Then and Now
Care Bears (and their cousins!) used to be a soft, cuddly bunch that liked to stare down bad guys every now and then. Is it just me, or do the new versions have unusually large heads? This somehow makes them look both younger and creepier at the same time.

My Little Ponies: Then and Now As with most 80's cartoons, the My Little Ponies were …